Legal Opinion

Carlock v. Krug

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1940No. 34,587PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivere'd by

Hoch, J.:

The plaintiff asserts ownership of an interest in production from an oil well, and asks an accounting. Defendants are the landowners, the lessee who brought in the well and the company which has been buying the oil. All defendants filed demurrers to the petition. From an order sustaining all demurrers the plaintiff appeals.

The principal question presented is whether the plaintiff, who claims under a mineral deed conveying an undivided interest in the oil and gas under the west half of the described quarter section, is entitled to an interest…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Burden v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. John P. Mills OrganizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Riffel v. DieterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Republic Natural Gas Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Central Pipe Line Co. v. HutsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TipkenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API