Legal Opinion

Coates v. De Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1956No. 12927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This appeal presents two principal questions. The first one is whether, under the terms of a judicial partition decree, the oil and gas royalties were partitioned and segregated so that the rule of non-apportionment applies. If the partition decree was so operative, the next question is whether an order of the Railroad Commission, which allocated 682.S acres to a producing gas well, resulted in a forced pooling among the owners of the allocated lands. The trial court held that the partition decree segregated the sub-surface and royalty, but that the Railroad Commission order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Garza v. DeMontalvoTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Mueller v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Hanrick v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ralph F. Howell v. Union Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Duffy v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Lehew v. LehewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API