Coates v. De Garcia
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This appeal presents two principal questions. The first one is whether, under the terms of a judicial partition decree, the oil and gas royalties were partitioned and segregated so that the rule of non-apportionment applies. If the partition decree was so operative, the next question is whether an order of the Railroad Commission, which allocated 682.S acres to a producing gas well, resulted in a forced pooling among the owners of the allocated lands. The trial court held that the partition decree segregated the sub-surface and royalty, but that the Railroad Commission order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Ryan Consolidated Petroleum Corp. v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Garza v. DeMontalvoTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Mueller v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Hanrick v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ralph F. Howell v. Union Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Duffy v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Lehew v. LehewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962