Cushman Motor Delivery Co. v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
We find that there is substantial evidence that the truck operated by Fitzgerald was parked at the time. Fitzgerald and Walker, his helper, admitted that the truck had been parked, but said that at the time of the collision they had started and were moving very slowly with the wheels on one side of the concrete and those on the other Side on the ground to the right of the concrete. Three witnesses, Berniek, Hines, and Harwood testified directly that the truck was stationary at the time and to facts tending to prove that it was. There was other circumstantial evidence to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. MaloySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Liberty Highway Co. v. CallahanOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beck v. CianchettiOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Gomez v. City Transp. Co. of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Cushman Motor Delivery Co. v. BernickOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Marshall v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Kraemer v. Bates Motor Transport Lines, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.