Cushman Motor Delivery Co. v. Bernick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, PJ.
The evidence' presented at the trial develops that one Fitzgerald was operating the truck with which the tractor and trailer of the plaintiffs collided upon a highway in the State of Indiana, that such truck was either parked or slightly moving at the time of the collision, that it was loaded with merchandise accepted by the defendant for interstate transportation as a common carrier. There was evidence that Fitz gerald was an independent contractor, carrying on the business of the defendant as a common carrier, engaged in interstate commerce, and there was also evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cushman Motor Delivery Co. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Plost v. Avondale Motor Car Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Marzono R. Shelly v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018