Legal Opinion

Hicklin v. Coney

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1933No. 94PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The Railroad Commission of South Carolina brought' this suit in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the State seeking the enforcement of the state statutes regulating transportation by motor vehicles. The peti tion alleged that the respondents below, including the present appellant, fell within Class “ F ” of motor vehicle carriers, that is, those known as contract carriers of property, not proposing to operate upon a regular schedule or over a regular route, and that they were carrying on their business on the public highways without having obtained the .required certificates…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. ScheinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API