United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, RULINGS AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
VIETOR, District Judge.
The government’s complaint alleges that defendants violated section I of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18.
In respect to the Clayton Act claim the defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and the government has filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment. The motions raise the issue of whether a lease agreement entered into between defendant Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Nabisco) as lessor and defendant Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Trade Commission v. Western Meat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Columbia Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Federal Trade Commission v. Thatcher Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- International Telephone and Telegraph Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- United States v. Rockford Memorial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1991
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.