Legal Opinion

Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 23, 2004No. C 02-05238 MHPPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PATEL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff challenges an agreement between Amazon.com, Inc. and Borders Online, LLC as violating federal and California antitrust laws, the California unfair competition law and the common law of unjust enrichment. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all claims. Plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) or in the alternative, for a continuance pursuant to Rule 56(f) to conduct further discovery. Having…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. In Re Facebook Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. Rollins v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Soule v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API