Legal Opinion
United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided August 6, 1987No. Civ. 83-51-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
YIETOR, Chief Judge.
This is an antitrust case brought by the United States of America (“Government”) against the defendants, Archer-DanieisMidland Company (“ADM”) and Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Nabisco).
On June 12, 1982, Nabisco leased to ADM, for a specified number of years, two corn wet milling plants, one in Clinton, Iowa, and the other in Montezuma, New York. The Government alleges that the lease agreement is a contract or combination creating an unreasonable restraint of trade in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and that the lease also amounts to an…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1991
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989