Legal Opinion
United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1986No. 85-1050PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a civil antitrust suit brought by the Government against the Areher-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Nabisco). ADM and Nabisco moved for dismissal, or for alternative relief, on the ground that the Government violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), the rule protecting the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. The district court 1 denied their motion and this appeal followed. ADM and Nabisco contend that the Government violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) by assigning attorneys who participated in a prior grand jury investigation to this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. John Doe, Inc. ISupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Popkin & Stern, Debtor. Nancy Fendell Lurie v. Robert J. Blackwell, Liquidating Trustee of the Popkin & Stern Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Hajecate v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- In Re Herbert E. Russell, Debtor. Thomas S. Streetman, Trustee for the Estate of Herbert E. Russell, Debtor v. Herbert E. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kluger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.