Legal Opinion

Citizens Federal Bank v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 10, 2002No. 92-656 CPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

This case is before the Court on the Defendant’s Petition for Reconsideration of the Coui’t’s liability decision with respect to the American transaction in the above-styled matter. Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United States, 51 Fed.Cl. 682 (2002). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Petition is DENIED.

I. Standard of Review for a Motion to Reconsider

A party may file a motion to reconsider under RCFC 59(a). RCFC 59(a) provides that:

A new trial or rehearing or reconsideration may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues, for any of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API