Legal Opinion
Tritek Technologies, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 7, 2005No. 02-255CPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Preclude Defendants from Relying Upon Summary Judgment Arguments Not Identified in Response to Plaintiffs Contention Interrogatories or in the Alternative, Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Plaintiffs motion.
I. Background
Tritek Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) owns U.S. Pat. No. 5,398,922 (“the ’922 patent”) directed to a feeder system for a mail sorter. Plaintiff filed a complaint for patent infringement on April…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Wilson v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Cohen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Spectrum Sciences & Software, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Accenture Global Services GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.