Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Weinberger
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 20, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 85-0016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
The court must decide the correct way to figure overtime pay for certain security guards who work for the federal government’s General Services Administration (GSA). The issue arises on cross motions for summary judgment on stipulated facts. For the reasons stated below, the court grants defendants’ motion.
I
These cross motions for summary judgment are really a sideshow to an action to collect overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Title 5 of the U.S.Code.1 In the main ring, the parties *1133are contesting whether defendant GSA owes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michael Zumerling v. Donald J. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Albert Slugocki, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. The United States, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Brooks v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General v. Donald D. McQuiggCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Delpin-Aponte v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- DeCosta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.