Legal Opinion

Oldenburg v. Brody

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1956No. Civ. 5098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action for claimed damages in the exchange of properties. In September, 1948, plaintiffs, cross-defendants and respondents William Oldenburg and Etta Oldenburg, his wife, and defendants, cross-complainants and appellants Louis Brody and Theora E. Brody, his wife, made an exchange of property through defendant, appellant and cross-complainant Burrow Escrow Company, a corporation. Two years later plaintiffs filed an action against defendants, and by their complaint alleged as a first cause of action that plaintiffs were the owners of an orange grove near Olive, and defendants Brody…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Joint Highway District No. 9 v. Ocean Shore RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oates v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Oates v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API