Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oates v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1969No. Civ. 31650Published

1DissentRoth, P. J.

I dissent.

Our Supreme Court points out in its order of retransfer of this case that Muktarian v. Barmby, 63 Cal.2d 558, 560 [47 Cal.Rptr. 483, 407 P.2d 659], limits the doctrine of Leeper v. Beltrami, 53 Cal.2d 195 [1 Cal.Rptr. 12, 347 P.2d 12, 77 A.L.R.2d 803], insofar as the statute of limitations is concerned. There is nothing in the order of retransfer which remotely suggests that Muktarian limits the doctrine of Leeper which requires our courts to look beyond the relief sought when the facts of the basic cause of action are apparent from the face of a pleading.

The pertinent allegations…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API