Legal Opinion

Joint Highway District No. 9 v. Ocean Shore Railroad

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1933No. Docket No. 8134PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is a proceeding in eminent domain. Upon a trial by the court sitting without a jury plaintiff had judgment against defendants Ocean Shore Railroad Company and McNee, condemning a right of way for highway purposes over the property of said defendants. In its findings the trial court determined that the “fair market value” of the property of the defendant Ocean Shore Railroad Company was $95,000 and that the “fair market value” of the property of defendant McNee Company was $17,000, and entered its judgment accordingly. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.

As the entire controversy on this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API