Legal Opinion

Foster v. Thornton

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 10, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Plaintiff in error was defendant in the court below in a suit instituted by defendant in error for damage resulting from the death of Mrs. Thornton, it being charged in the declaration in effect that Dr. Foster on the 22nd day of January, 1932, and prior thereto, held himself out to the public as capable of treating persons afflicted with diseases and bodily ailments, etc., without the use of medicine or drugs by a form or method of treatment peculiar to a class of practitioners to which the defendant belonged and known to the public as Chiropractors; that he undertook to treat plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atkins v. HumesSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Bourgeois v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Orme v. Burr Burch v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Dohr v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API