People v. Phippin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Kespondent was convicted of unlawfully holding himself out to practice medicine, etc., and fined five dollars and costs of prosecution, and the judgment was affirmed. The facts, and points of counsel, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This respondent was arrested on July 28, 1887, for unlawfully advertising and holding himself out to practice medicine between June 29 and July 28, 1887, under Act No. 167, Laws of 1883, entitled “An act to promote public health.”
The complaint charges, in substance, that on June 29, and between that day and the date of making this complaint {July 28), at the city of Grand Eapids, in the county of Kent, one William W. Phippin did then and there advertise and hold himself out to the public as authorized to practice medicine, and did practice medicine, in the city, county, and State aforesaid,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. CurrensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.