Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jasper
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 21, 2010No. C 07-06122 JWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL; GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF
JAMES WARE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought this civil enforcement action against Carl W. Jasper (“Defendant”) alleging, inter alia, violations of § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and various SEC rules. The SEC alleges that Defendant unlawfully backdated options grants and submitted false financial statements for Maxim Integrated…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RoszakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SabrdaranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BardmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WALLDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.