Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bardman

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 8, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-02023-JSTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

Before the Court is Defendant Erik K. Bardman’s motion to dismiss the Tenth Claim for Relief in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) First Amended Complaint (FAC). ECF No. 44. The Court will deny the motion.

I. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE CURRENT MOTION TO DISMISS1

The SEC brought this case alleging that Logitech International, S.A. (“Logitech”) fraudulently overstated its operating income, falsely represented that Logitech’s accounting complied with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. ITT Educ. Servs., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018
Garon v. Keleops USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025