Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sabrdaran
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 15, 2017No. Case No. 14-cv-04825-JSCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL AND REMEDY MOTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 170, 175
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charge that Defendants Sasan Sabrdaran and Farhang Afsarpour engaged in insider trading in violation of the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Following a three-week trial, the jury returned a verdict in the SEC’s favor. Now pending before the Court are Defendants’ joint motion for judgment as a matter of law, or in the alternative, a new trial and the SEC’s post-trial remedies motion. (Dkt. Nos. 170,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bobby Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Camarillo v. Balboa Thrift and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- LeDoux v. Outliers IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. WahiDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024