Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. Dorosko

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1989No. 885SC650PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

In an opinion in the above-styled matter filed 4 April 1989, this court affirmed summary judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiffs’ claims of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unfair *638and deceptive trade practices. We granted plaintiffs’ petition to rehear in order to consider whether we misstated the legal standard for a claim asserted under N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 75-1.1 and whether we improperly affirmed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment. We now withdraw our previous opinion in part, and we reverse and remand with respect to defendants West and Carolina Beach…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Brice v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Blackwell v. DoroskoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Stone v. ConderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bhatti v. BucklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. CBP RESOURCES, INC. v. SGS Control Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  3. John v. RobbinsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
  4. Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API