Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. Dorosko

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1989No. 885SC650PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Brett Blackwell and Dana E. Blackwell, sued defendants, Carolina Beach Realty, Charles West, and George Dorosko, alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unfair and deceptive trade practices. The parties executed a Stipulation of Dismissal against third-party defendant Kick Enterprises, Inc., on 22 April 1987. On 28 March 1988, the trial judge entered an order granting summary judgment for the remaining defendants. From this judgment plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

I

Brett Blackwell and Dana Blackwell are residents of Farm-ington Hills, Michigan. In May 1985, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Winston Realty Co., Inc. v. GHG, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Libby Hill Seafood Restaurants, Inc. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bhatti v. BucklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Douglas v. DoubCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Blackwell v. DoroskoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API