Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1990No. 8929SC162Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge GREENE

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

While I agree with the majority in affirming the trial court on most of the issues presented, I believe the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc., Wynelle M. Thompson, and Donald 0. Thompson on both the fraud and unfair trade practices claims, and for Dorothy E. Kefgen on the fraud claim.

*348I

Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc. and Wynelle M. Thompson

The majority conclude that “plaintiffs have not produced any evidence that defendant Wynelle Thompson or any representative of defendant Beverly-Hanks,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980
  5. Powell v. WoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API