Stone v. Conder
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
Counsel have stipulated that the applicability of the Rule in Shelley’s case shall not be presented to the Court at this time. Therefore, we do not discuss that issue.
One question is presented for our consideration. Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred?
We note the trial judge made it clear that in summarizing the facts that he was not making findings of fact but merely reciting those material facts which he considered uncontroverted. In determining a motion for summary judgment, “the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Mosley v. National Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Alexander v. Richmond Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Williams v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jernigan v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Baugh v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Blackwell v. DoroskoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- QUB Studios, LLC v. MarshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Cassada v. CassadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991