In re Supreme Court Commissioners
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In several cases that have been submitted to the supreme court commission and decided by the court, motions for rehearing have been filed. The contention is made that the act of 1915 creating the supreme court commission is unconstitutional and void, because the appellant has been deprived of his right to be heard in the court of last resort, as provided for in the Bill of Rights: “The right to be heard in all civil cases in the court of last resort, by appeal, error, or otherwise, shall not be denied.” Const., art. I, sec. 24. It is said, also, that the act deprives appellant of its property…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- People ex rel. Morgan v. HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Randall v. National Building, Loan & Protective UnionNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- In re Supreme Court CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Obrien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Cooper v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Ready Mix, Inc. v. Nebraska Railroads of Western Trunk Lines CommitteeNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Good v. National Old Line Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Barnett v. Happy Cab Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.