Legal Opinion

Randall v. National Building, Loan & Protective Union

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1895No. 5736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for rehearing of case reported in 42 Neb., 809. Motion overruled.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

It is evident from the brief submitted by counsel for the appellant that they are not familiar with the methods of transacting business in this court. The fact that the opinion heretofore filed (42 Neb., 809) was not prepared by a member of the court must not be taken as an indication that the conclusion therein announced represents the views of the commissioners only. On the contrary, every question of law, and, so far as practicable, every issue of fact, is examined by all of the members of the court, both judges and commissioners; and, in accordance with our invariable rule, opinions,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Old Dominion Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Randall v. National Building, Loan & Protective UnionNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Livingston Loan & Building Ass'n v. DrummondNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People's Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. FowbleUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hale v. StengerWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In re Supreme Court CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re Baker's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API