Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Morgan v. Hayne

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1890No. 13660PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This case comes to us on appeal from the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. It is one of such commanding public importance, involving as it does, the course of procedure in and validity of many of the judgments rendered by this court, that upon motion it has been advanced on the calendar, and is given precedence in the order of determination.

*112It is a proceeding against the defendants, E. Y. Hayne, H. S. Foote, I. S. Belcher, J. A. Gibson, and P. Yanclief, the commissioners of this court, to inquire “by what authority they claim to exercise any judicial powers within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Underwood v. McDuffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Shoultz v. McPheetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Fewel v. FewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re Rose VCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Fay v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API