Cooper v. Otero
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKTEY, Justice.
Certain creditors sued for a receiver of the bank. The state bank examiner, a defendant, answered and otherwise participated in the proceedings, requesting, among other things, that he be appointed as receiver.
Receivers Cooper and Powell were appointed by Judge Helmick, the resident judge of the- Second district court, who declined to name the state bank examiner as such re- ; ceiver. The examiner and his counsel, the Attorney General, made no objection to the proceedings therein for some time. After-wards the Attorney General, on behalf of the state, in a separate action,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Sorensen v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Craughwell v. Mousam River Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- Eagle Mining & Improvement Co. v. LundNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- M. R. Harris Estate v. West Grove Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Board of Insurance v. BettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Quintana v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Los Alamos Assessor v. State Tax CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Lauderdale Ex Rel. Leyba v. Hydro Conduit Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.