Trawick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the lower court erred in refusing appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 1
Our scope of review in assessing a lower court’s ruling on a motion for judgment n. o. v. was comprehensively summarized by Judge HOFFMAN in his opinion for the court in Eldridge v. Melcher, 226 Pa.Super. 381, 386, 313 A.2d 750, 753 (1973) (citations have been omitted) :
A judgment n. o. v. is the directing of a verdict in favor of the losing party, despite a verdict to the contrary. It may only be entered in a clear case where the evidence is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Campbell v. G. C. Murphy Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Banas v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ludmer v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Foflygen v. Allegheny General HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McCloskey v. New York Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.