Legal Opinion

Dalmas v. Kemble

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1906No. Appeal, No. 379PublishedCited by 77 opinions

Appeal, No. 379, Jan. T., 1905, by-plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1901, No. 1,339, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Louis Dalrnas v. Clay Kemble. Assumpsit for commissions. Before McMichael, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000. On a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto under the Act of April 22, 1905, P. L. 286, the court entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 379, Jan. T., 1905, by-plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1901, No. 1,339, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Louis Dalrnas v. Clay Kemble. Assumpsit for commissions. Before McMichael, J. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $5,000. On a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto under the Act of April 22, 1905, P. L. 286, the court entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. Error assigned was the judgment of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Mitchell,

The defendant being desirous of procuring a loan applied to several brokers, among whom were plaintiff and one MacDonald, to get it for him. Both brokers negotiated with the United Security Company which finally made the loan, and the issue in the present case was who was the first and efficient procurer. The security company acted on a formal application filed by MacDonald, but plaintiff testified that the MacDonald negotiations were merely part of plaintiff’s and there was other evidence to this effect, among which was the very significant fact *411that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reel v. ElderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Butts v. ArmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. North American Oil Co. v. Forsyth Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Huffman v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Kotlikoff v. Master, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API