Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron Works

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1975No. 79PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

On April 15, 1965, the appellee, Pittsburgh Bridge and Iron Works, sent one of its forklift split-wheels to the Beaver Valley Tire Service for installation of a new tire on the wheel. Beaver Valley was in the business of selling new tires, recapping used tires and doing general tire repair work. The owner of Beaver Valley, Robert Mc-Candless, separated the wheel and removed the old tire. The appellant, Daniel Lambert, who was eighteen years of age and had been employed as a tire changer with Beaver Valley for approximately nine months prior thereto, then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Frankel v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Thomas v. RibbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Lambert v. Pittsburgh Bridge & Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. IDZOJTIC v. CatalucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Gouse v. CasselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Wright v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. COM. EX REL. CORBETT v. SnyderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Donaldson v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API