Legal Opinion

Foflygen v. Allegheny General Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1999PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal, Appellant, Janice Fofly-gen, asks us to determine whether the information she received prior to her gastric-bypass surgery was sufficient to constitute informed consent. We hold that the validity of a surgical patient’s informed consent depends upon the pretreatment information relayed to the patient, regardless of whether the disclosures are made by the treating physician or another qualified person such as a nurse or other assistant. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the trial court’s final order of judgment in favor of Appellees, Allegheny General…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Samuel Rappaport Family Partnership v. Meridian BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Childers v. Power Line Equipment Rentals, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Shinal, M., et ux, Aplts. v. Toms M.D., S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Panea v. IsdanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Detterline v. D'Ambrosio's Dodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API