Legal Opinion

Kienbaum v. Haberny

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.

The complaint in the mortgage-foreclosure action commenced by the plaintiff, Carl Kienbaum, in March, 1954, alleged default in payment of the obligation of the defendants Edward C. Haberny and Mary Haberny, his wife, under a first mortgage executed to the plaintiff on December 17, 1951, conditioned for the payment of $18,000 as evidenced by a note in said sum.

The complaint also alleged that the defendant, Agnes Plaberny, is the owner and holder of a second mortgage in the sum of $2,000 covering the real estate involved. It was alleged that this second mortgage was recorded in vol. 290 of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLoughlin v. MalnarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Madison v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Milwaukee County v. Milwaukee Western Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Lenfesty v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Union Cemetery v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heaton v. Independent Mortuary Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Paschong v. HollenbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API