Legal Opinion

Paschong v. Hollenbeck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1961PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The basic issue is whether the trial court committed error in refusing to exercise its discretion to relieve the appellant from the order of September 14, 1959. Sec. 269.46 (1), Stats., provides a court may within one year after notice thereof relieve a party from a judgment, order, stipulation, or other proceeding obtained against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The appellant contends the failure of his attorney to take the steps necessary to protect his interest in the surplus funds constituted excusable neglect on his part because he acted as a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Vartanian v. CrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. WiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API