Legal Opinion

State v. Dairyland Power Cooperative

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1971No. 358PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are presented on appeal:(1) Has sec. 280.02, Stats., been repealed by implication;(2) Does either the exhaustion of remedies rule or the primary jurisdiction rule deprive the circuit court of jurisdiction to hear the merits of the matter; and(3) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ?

Repeal by implication.

Sec. 280.02, Stats., provides as follows:

“Injunction against public nuisance, time extension. An action to enjoin a public nuisance may be commenced and prosecuted in the name of the state, either by the attorney general on information…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. VoneshCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. In Interest of IVCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API