State v. Dairyland Power Cooperative
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Three issues are presented on appeal:(1) Has sec. 280.02, Stats., been repealed by implication;(2) Does either the exhaustion of remedies rule or the primary jurisdiction rule deprive the circuit court of jurisdiction to hear the merits of the matter; and(3) Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ?
Repeal by implication.
Sec. 280.02, Stats., provides as follows:
“Injunction against public nuisance, time extension. An action to enjoin a public nuisance may be commenced and prosecuted in the name of the state, either by the attorney general on information…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Wisconsin Collectors Asso. v. Thorp Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. VoneshCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- In Interest of IVCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.