McLoughlin v. Malnar
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The practice of resorting to motions for summary judgment came into being to prevent delay in the entry of a judgment due to the interposition of unfounded, false, or frivolous answers. Unless it can be said from the pleadings and the disclosures made by affidavits that the counterclaim presents no cause of action or is false and frivolous, the motion should, be denied. The circuit court was of the opinion that, giving the pleadings the benefit of a reasonable and liberal construction, a genuine and substantial issue of fact was shown to exist. Without discussing the merits of the claim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. HalseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Winslow v. . MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- City of Madison v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Sullivan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Union Cemetery v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Town of Blooming Grove v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.