Legal Opinion

Laro Lumber Co., Inc. v. Patrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 1981No. 36224, CA 17828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a construction lien for work done on a road. Defendant counterclaimed, contending that plaintiff failed to complete the work in a workmanlike manner, and prayed for damages representing the cost of completing the work in accordance with the contract terms.

The trial court found that the parties had entered into a written contract under which plaintiff agreed to construct a road to defendant’s subdivision development for cost plus 10 percent to "* * * be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to standard practices.” It found that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Beik v. American Plaza Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. North Pacific Construction Co. v. Wallowa CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Simkins-Hallin Lumber Co. v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. SDS Lumber Co. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API