Laro Lumber Co., Inc. v. Patrick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a construction lien for work done on a road. Defendant counterclaimed, contending that plaintiff failed to complete the work in a workmanlike manner, and prayed for damages representing the cost of completing the work in accordance with the contract terms.
The trial court found that the parties had entered into a written contract under which plaintiff agreed to construct a road to defendant’s subdivision development for cost plus 10 percent to "* * * be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to standard practices.” It found that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Douglas Construction Corp. v. Mazama Timber Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Beik v. American Plaza Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- North Pacific Construction Co. v. Wallowa CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Banister Continental Corp. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Hazelwood Water District v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Parsons v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Simkins-Hallin Lumber Co. v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- SDS Lumber Co. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.