Legal Opinion

Simkins-Hallin Lumber Co. v. Simonson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1984No. 84-259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson

Martha Simonson appeals from a judgment of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, County of Gallatin, ordering foreclosure of a materialmans’ lien against her and awarding Simkins-Hallin Lumber Company costs and attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The facts of this case are not at issue. The appellant, Martha Simonson, entered into an oral agreement with Ed Barefield, d/b/a Bear Construction, to build an addition to her house in Belgrade, Montana. At her deposition, Simon-son asserted that the agreement contemplated a 528 square foot addition at the contract price…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Jack Endo Electric, Inc. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Peterman-Donnelly Engineers & Contractors Corp. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Las Vegas Plywood & Lumber, Inc. v. D & D EnterprisesNevada Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Glaspey v. WorkmanMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. MLM Const. Co., Inc. v. Pace Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Galt v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Martinez v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API