Legal Opinion
Merlina v. Jejna
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 18, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0535PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 Demi-Jon Merlina appeals from the superior court’s judgment denying special action relief. Merlina was charged in city court with three DUI offenses. He argued in the superior court that the charges were multiplicitous, prejudicial and violative of Rule 13.2, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the following reasons, we affirm the court’s denial of relief.
¶2 The pertinent facts are as follows. Merlina was charged with DUI having a BAC of .15 or greater in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 28-1382 (Supp.2003); DUI having a BAC of .08 or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Russell Reed, James S. Doyle, and Thomas Francis RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Adrian E. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Stoudamire v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito EstrellaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.