Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Presiding J.
¶ 1 Appellants Empress Adult Video and Bookstore and Oseo Communications Group (collectively, Empress) operate an adult-oriented business that principally sells and *54rents nonobscene, sexually explicit materials and predominantly features nonobscene, sexually explicit live performances.1 As a result, A.R.S. § 13-1422, in conjunction with A.R.S. § 11-821, requires Empress to close between 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. from Monday through Saturday and between 1:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on Sunday; failure to do so constitutes a class one misdemeanor.2 Empress sought an…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Standhardt v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. StummerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.