Legal Opinion
United States v. Jorge Cortes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2014No. 12-50137PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The Opinion filed October 9, 2013, appearing at 732 F.3d 1078, is amended as follows:
1. At slip op. 4, 732 F.3d at 1082, in the third sentence of the first paragraph, change “Accordingly, we reverse the Count 1 conviction and remand for a retrial” to “Accordingly, we reverse the convictions and remand for a retrial.”
2. At slip op.4, 732 F.3d at 1082, replace the fifth sentence of the first paragraph, which begins “We also affirm the Hobbs Act conviction....” with “We also reject Cortes’s argument that Hobbs Act robbery or extortion is limited to the stealing of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Noah KleinmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Maria MoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Javier PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Susan RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.