Legal Opinion
United States v. Noah Kleinman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 16, 2017No. 14-50585PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
Defendantr-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion filed June 16, 2017, and reported at 859 F.3d 825, is hereby withdrawn. A superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
Judge M. Smith and Judge N.R. Smith vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Ebel so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc, filed the same date, is DENIED. No further…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Daniel TrevinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Javier PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Alexander NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.