Legal Opinion
United States v. Carty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2008No. 05-10200, 05-30120PublishedCited by 1,469 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RYMER; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINKSKI; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN.
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
We ordered rehearing en banc in these cases to clarify our sentencing law in the wake of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).1 Events overtook us, however, when the United States Supreme Court granted cer-tiorari in Claiborne v. United States and Rita v. United States. As the issues were similar to those in our appeals, we deferred submission pending the Court’s decisions.
The Court rendered its opinion in Rita on June 21, 2007, holding that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,469 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Valencia-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DallmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1,464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.