Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Garcia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2014No. 12-10189PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Daniel Garcia (Garcia) challenges his conviction for using a pipe bomb to damage a vehicle and apartment building in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844®. Garcia contends that the government failed to present sufficient evidence to satisfy the Commerce Clause jurisdictional requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 844®, because the government failed to demonstrate that Garcia’s criminal conduct affected interstate commerce. Garcia also maintains that the district court erred in instructing the jury that damage to the rental apartment building and vehicle met the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Victor TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Steven GrovoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Chang Ru Meng BackmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Lorenzo GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James Hill, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.