Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Pegler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1954PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The jury in this libel action returned a verdict for compensatory damages against all three defendants in the sum of $1 and for punitive damages against the defendant Pegler in the sum of $100,-000, against the defendant The Hearst Corporation in the sum of $50,000, and against the defendant Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc. in the sum of $25,000.

The defendants move under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. to set aside the verdict for punitive damages principally upon the ground of excessiveness, contending in substance that the verdict…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Corrigan v. . Bobbs-Merrill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Thomas Zarcone v. William M. Perry, James Windsor, Robert J. Anderson and Patrick GiambalvoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. James Morrissey, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. National Maritime Union of America, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Joseph CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API