Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Carlile

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1997No. 87572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUETTNER, Judge:

The sole question presented for our review is whether Oca Mae Carlile’s workers’ compensation claim against the Special Indemnity Fund was barred by the statute of limitations. The Workers’ Compensation Court found that the claim was timely filed. We agree and sustain the order.

Physically impaired workers who sustain additional disabilities on the job, and for whom the resulting disability is materially greater than that which would have resulted from the additional injury alone, receive workers’ compensation benefits for the amount of their full disability.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. HulseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Autry v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Loftis v. Multiple Injury Trust FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API