Legal Opinion

Autry v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 2001No. 94,919PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

T1 The facts are not disputed. Charles Thomas Autry (Claimant) sustained a com-pensable injury to his lower back on March 8, 1994. On January 2, 1995, he suffered a second injury, this one to his right foot. Both injuries occurred while he was working for Lance, Inc. (Employer). A workers' compensation claim was filed for each injury.

T2 Permanent partial disability was awarded on September 1, 1999, for the first injury and on September 14, 1999 for the second injury. Claimant challenged the trial tribunal's calculation of benefits for the first injury before an en bane panel of the Workers'…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Fraternal Order of Police No. 165 v. City of ChoctawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. CarlileCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  2. BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. PullumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. St. John Medical Center v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. WadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API