Tapio v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGilbertson, Justice
[¶ 1.] Amber Tapio and Sunny Big Eagle (Tapio) brought a declaratory judgment action against Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (Grinnell) to determine whether Grinnell was obligated to provide coverage to Delores Sazue, the named insured on a policy issued by Grinnell. Grinnell appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Tapio. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] There is no dispute as to the facts leading up to this appeal. On March 28, 1997, Sean Sazue was driving a car owned by his mother, Delores Sazue. While driving the vehicle, Sean negligently collided with Tapio. At…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Morgan v. BaldwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Lincoln General Insurance v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- DM&E Railroad Corp. v. Heritage InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002