Legal Opinion

Marubeni America Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 3, 1995No. Court No. 91-10-00730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1250OPINION AND ORDER

Introduction

Newman, Senior Judge:

The issue presented concerns the proper tariff classification and rate of duty to be assessed by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) on certain internally grooved seamless copper tubing, sold under the trade name “Thermofin” by Hitachi Cable Ltd. of Japan and imported by plaintiff during 1989-90.

Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a), and therefore Customs’ classification decision is before the court for de novo review in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2636. Currently before the court for decision are cross-motions for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marcor Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  2. Faus Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  3. Amity Leather Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  4. Anval Nyby Powder AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  5. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API