Legal Opinion

Esco Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 11, 1975No. Court No. 72-1-00240PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper tariff classification of electric filament lamps described on the invoices as C-9-J4 type, 120 volt “Christmas Light Bulbs” or “Christmas Bulbs.” 1 The articles — which were imported from Japan via the port of Los Angeles in 1970 and 1971- — -were classified by the government under item 686.30 of the tariff schedules as “Christmas-tree lamps” and assessed duty at the rate of 10 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that the imported lamps are properly classifiable under item 686.90 of the tariff schedules, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as “other electric…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Mobilite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Hy-Glow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esco Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API